![]() ![]() All I'm saying is that the number of "notable X's" will grow and you really can not trim it. In my experience even the most mundane file manager has(or had) got an user base large enough to disprove that it is not notable at all. That may be going too far in this case but still. Trimming is IMHO not an option and is actually similar to an information embargo. I can't disagree more with you - some of the really time unworthy things are mentioned very slovenly here in Wikipedia and yet they are deemed "notable". I also dare to say that this list is a very good startup point for a new file manager article to be risen from. But the point is, who is to say that those 6 are not note worthy since no one ventured to make an article for them (yet). Out of the currently mentioned 36 file managers only 6 do not have articles. simxp ( talk) 17:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Reply Alright, I wasn't expecting this. Though it probably is about time to go through and trim out all the ones who's articles have been deleted. Any "Comparison of X" article in Wikipedia is not a comparison of all X's, but a comparison of notable X's, where 'notable' is defined as 'has a Wikipedia article and so fulfils WP:N'. ![]() 12:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Reply Unnecessary, IMO. Bert Racoon | Life is not a dream, it's a nightmare.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |